There isn’t much to describe the aimlessness in which I operate on at a quotidien level. I wake up, I ponder for two minutes what I ought to do for the day, I worry about my finances and then I surf the net. At some point in time, I feel hunger but a listlessness permeates my lacklustre eating. But eating is something to do and I crave for anything to occupy myself with. This wasn’t the glam life that was promised to high-flying MBAs, but I think it’s just me. On days when I get invited to go shopping with girlfriends, we shop and wished we had the money to buy a Chloe dress that would be oh-so-fabulous but frankly, it being Singapore - where does one wear a Chloe dress to? Certainly not to a Ghost Rider action flick. So, I end up buying crap that I don’t need, because it doesn’t cost me $500 but fills the void for consumerism, but only ever so slightly.
The girly conversations are thematic. They mostly are about men, and mostly, sob stories at that. Being unappreciated, trying hard and not getting anywhere, where to find a good (ie. sane, non drug abusing, non-selfish) male individual. This wasn’t what Sex In The City promised, that women could be liberated and free. savvy and sexy at 30. Based on my experience, it seems like women detest being liberated and free. The whole point of being liberated and free is so that they can be available on the market to become un-liberated and un-free. Tres interessant, n’est-ce pas? If not men, then about weight. So far, despite my copious and feverish recent readings into China’s history, or the Misbehaviour of Markets (financial theory, risk assessment techniques, monto carlo simulations) or The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth - none of that has emerged as a viable topic as yet. Perhaps, the rest of the world is happy to proceed as it proceeds. And one should change one’s reading fodder to include self-help journals or Elle magazine, just to relate better to what is most meaningful for others. Anyway, looking at pretty dresses is quite nice, especially since spring is all about the frou frou and the flirty.
It’s random. all random. As much as I feel thankful being surrounded by great friends who care, there is still a sense of unsurety, a kind of nagging dissonance and this is not post-purchase dissonance, it’s just an apathy to life, the future, to other people’s problems. When one is bogged down emotionally with oneself, it is hard to extend outwards and pay attention to those around you. Which makes it terrible, because not only do I not have an agenda, my own selfish reality has not allowed me to sympathise with someone’s else agenda. At this point in time, how I wished i could economically allocate depression away, just like a redistributive welfare system and in return i take some happy benefits from someone else that has too much of it (eg. great career, loads of money, a house, a loving dog/ pet fish, a partner of choice). But if our societies cannot even decide what is the fairness index that surrounds a tangible distributive system (ie. money as an allocation mechansim), it is a hopeless case for the intangible (ie. happiness, welfare) redistributive system to work.
I get ahead of myself. This is dribble. But the randomness is not. As I slurp my fishball noodles at breakfast, i am entertained by a lion dance. I tap my chopsticks in sync with the loud cymbal clashes.
As i drive, i am reminded that Singapore is still a developing nation where the weird and the hardworking coincide. This push-cart trash man was fixing his equipment in the middle of the street, just to save a couple of minutes in between traffic light changes. No rest for the weary.
And i am reminded at how unspecific people can be. When ordering an Ipoh hor fun, the chef tells us that it is all seafood…well, we asked if it was all seafood and she just nodded. But of course, the ipoh hor fun turns up with all chicken and 1 prawn. Even with a relatively specific question, people can be obtuse and opaque. Much less when people aim to communicate their feelings at an in-depth level. Stories abound of how she says she tried to be super attentive and caring and he says she was stalking him. Or, that she thought they were dating and he thought they were just hanging out. Minna says that all this jargon seems "very American" and I think it’s the modern disease of unspecificity, the fear of commitment to specifics through language. After all, the depth of language is a reflection of the mind and unspecific communication is simply a manifestation of non-commitment or the need to maintain an open option for escape. And like all call options, being ‘in the money" means promising less and building increased expectations that the stock will rise in price (ie. the other party says specifically what you want to hear/ understand). Ok, this is arcane, but I have realized that beyond the rude sexuality of financial lingo (eg. straddles, puts, splits), a lot of it is quite applicable to assessing life. *applause*
Ok, maybe i am just a dork. but there is no rest for the weary or the weary-hearted.