Given the reduced readership of my blog of late (due to my graduating from Insead), I feel almost safe to make today’s post and this post is just to help me emote, to ensure that i am still somewhat alive and most of all, just to help me sleep because I have not slept in about 72 hours now. in all likelihood, this blog will go private in a couple of hours (as soon as i figure out how to enact the privacy function), but i thought it would be important to get it out there anyways.
Like all tumultuous events in life, things move at an unexpected pace. overnight, 9-11 changed the world, shifting U.S foreign policy, heightening every individual’s fear of terrorism and changing the world’s airport and domestic security operations. Watergate, Hurricane Katrina, Tsunamis, Asian crisis, Enron - it was a jolting affair, where the community is hit without any knowledge and as quickly as it comes, it alters daily living: how one breathes, how one perceives and how one moves to protect one’s personal space, increasing their personal fears - ironically, adding to a wealth of already-accumulated fears from life (bad performance reviews, failed family relations, watching a lousy movie etc). we must die very wretchedly…
Being alive one minute and dead the next is another example and , being coupled in one instance and then made single the next. How does one pick up the pieces and move on? Is it simply a matter of burning all photographs, erasing that person’s name from your daily vocabulary, or as one of my friend’s suggests "drinking till you are drunk, but not quite to not know what you are doing, but enough to go home with the wrong person.", or is it about going out there and placing yourself in a "meet new people" situation, where one behaves awkwardly and wears the scars of sadness, suspicion and emotional torment? Perhaps, it’s a multi-forked Endeavour to enact all of the above.
I haven’t been able to write and have been cursed with a despondency that makes me fairly unpredictable, from bursting out in tears in the metro, to non-response at other people’s well wishes. In the movie Alfie, Jude Law says that it is never a good idea to be alone for the 12 days of Christmas, because that is a celebratory time, a time where everyone hugs and shows affection freely and one therefore, should never strive to be single. I would add another event to this - never be single on one’s birthday. Being single to one’s "almost 30" status is minging. It reminds one of how so many of your friends are secured with a partner, perhaps even in a marital status that they can rightfully swim in and you are just out there, wondering if investment banking is the right thing to do (still) and if you will turn into one of those cat-people/ career women whom claim that their swinging 30’s "is the best thing ever" and make comments such as "i love my job and my life." and where the daily routine is to eat less than 1800 calories and go to the gym or do fun things like classes for sexy pole-dancing (for liberation), rock climbing (for physique) and speed-dating (in hope to meet someone, but if not, just to feel silly). my god, i can’t be one of those women…it’s too unfulfilling and almost placating - to whom and for whom, i don’t know, but it’s patronizing for the soul and simply said, it passes the time, but not in a particularly life-changing or contenting way.
upon coming back to France, I receive an invite from Alison and Gillaume to head to Fleche d’Or and watch some french indie bands. in between dancing to The Pixies, and watching a pretty cool act - Brooklyn, Alison and I start whinging about love and relationships. I ask her her opinion of the Satre-de Beauvoir partnership and she (a french girl) pukes out her mojito and starts laughing. "Oh no no no, you cannot date anyone who believes that. That is Crap. Simone de Beauvoir was utterly depressed and in the end, it was just some kind of intellectual discussion between them." This is good advice, and makes me feel better to know that I did catch on to something. I had read her books and seen the transformation of (all) her female characters, all tortured and all dying a little everyday, inside, from what they feel is the passing of love and hence, life. Perhaps, even for the modern woman, the two are inextricably tied. And in thinking about a woman’s happiness, which stems from sovereignty (of course), it isn’t quite complete if there isn’t someone to share it with. Alison and I agree that yes, women do seek partnerships (not necessarily marriage) where the need to contribute and the need to be needed is quite important. Why is there miscommunication between expectations among couples? Is it because men are so devoid of human insight? The formula seems simple, women are easily contented and made happy with their partners when it appears that their partners need them in their life - be it to go to the supermarket together or simply, just to be around for emotional support. A somewhat simple formula that gets crowded in today’s world of "We should not make suboptimal choices for each other.", "if one has to try, then it’s not meant to be." or worse, " my inability to commit is a revealed preference of my indifference curve. I don’t want you to give up anything for me" (sorry, I had to blog this one - too good to pass up).
so, in my economically-challenged way, here is my explanation of women and relationships using economic theory. What if the decision isn’t sub-optimal? What if, there isn’t an opportunity cost to hanging around (meaning, there isn’t a better activity to take on), and because wanting to do stuff together supersedes other less glamorous activities?) By that very conclusion, it’s not about giving up a basket of scarce opportunities (there is nothing i would prefer more than hanging around my partner); at this juncture, one has chosen the maximum point on the indifference curve. And of course, over time, revealed preferences or preferences for risk, goods, services, emotions change and hence, it is true that in an modern and existentialist way, we are never meant to be together because yes, over time, indifference curves shift and preferences change but i don’t buy this suboptimal argument. sounds like hogwash because any decision taken at the particular point in time is justified by one’s revealed preference and risk appetite. only then, can a decision be taken, no? In theory, the costs of regret have already been accounted for and any decision taken fundamentally concludes that there isn’t a better option and that the benefits received from love and affection far outweigh the costs of previous life choices? The invisible hand makes it possible for individual’s to take decisions, thank god for market clearing mechanisms. There shouldn’t be a feeling that one has given up anything for another person or the stress that one takes on because someone else made a decision for them?
Alison and I both agree that seeking breakup closure is probably imminently important, dating a french man would be a somewhat good idea (at least, she thinks so) and making a bomb-ass Myspace page is definitely important, since everybody who is somebody won’t be caught dead giving you time of day, unless one had a Myspace address.
I think I am being blasé, but it is a good self-protection mechanism. Perhaps, it’s the curse of running into the arms of self-sufferance (it is after all…the Asian way). With not many days left in Paris, there is ton for me to accomplish and hence I try to remind myself that I need to get dressed and I need to go out and I need to talk to people and feel stimulated by art, culture, a book or even a song.
The nature of a blog does not permit long essays and there is probably a lot more to be said, about how i feel, about how i had hoped life to be different, about perseverance and about the joys of couplehood - but, that must be for another time, since i should continue to work on my Myspace profile and upload more archived photos onto Flickr and be absorbed in head-numbing mundanities so i don’t actually reconcile with how i truly feel. Perhaps in 2007, one must strive for the deadening of one’s heart. Apparently, that makes one stronger. If what can’t break you makes you stronger, then it can only be done with the loss of soul and optimism. it’s a trade-off. This is a hardened thought and already, I begin my journey into a pessimism or on contra, what the new and upwardly mobile society terms as "individualism" and "independence" and " a power to you" status where one only needs to live for…oneself. can’t be too difficult - except the silence of loneliness can be deafening.